1. Describe the Canton System and discuss the causes of Sino-British conflict deriving from this commercial arrangement and other disparities. The Canton System-- From 1757 until the opening of four other ports by the Treaty of Nanking of 1842, Canton was the only legally permissible trading place for foreign traders, including the British. In fact, the Canton System (in connection with Britain) was one of the terminals of the China-India-Britain triangular trade. The chief intermediary agent here was the English East India Company. The EIC's organisation at Canton began to evolve in its permanent form by the 1780s when a Select Committee was set up in Canton to supervise the EIC's affairs in China. This Select Committee had to carry out the Orders from the Court of Directors in London. This company had a strict monopoly on English trade between Canton and London (through India) which included numerous commodities (e.g. lead, tin, copper, woollens and cottons). The largest export from Canton was tea, whose value amounted to 3.6 million pound sterlings by 1800. The balance of trade was always unfavourable to Britain until the British found their opium import into China. This unfavourable condition was somewhat balanced by the so-called 'country trade' which was a transaction between China and India carried out by private British traders licensed by EIC in India. The net profit out of this country trade amounted to one-third of the EIC's fund. The Cohong--
On the Chinese side, the monopoly of trade resided in a small group
of merchants known as the hong merchants. In 1720 they formed themselves
into a monopolistic guild known as the Cohong with the function of
regulating prices and strengthening their position in the dealing with
Chinese government authorities and foreign merchants. In 1760 this
system was officially recognised and the Canton authorities had set
up the security merchant system. It was instituted that every foreign
ship had to find one hong merchant to assume responsibility for its
conduct and duties. Trading Season-- Normal trading commenced in October and ended in March (except for the illegal opium trade). A foreign ship had to obtain a permit and a pilot in Macao before it entered the Bogue. The ship then set sail and anchored at Whampoa where the business transactions were done through the hong merchants. The ship had alsc to pay some specified duties and charges such as the ship measurement duty, the cumsha (present), the charge for the pilotage, and the fees for the comprador and linguist. After the unloading and reloading (if any) of goods, the ship had to obtain a port clearance (ch'uan.p'ai) in order to depart from Canton. The Canton Factories and the Eight Regulations--The foreign companies leased their factories from the hong merchants. The foreigners had to employ a comprador to supervise the domestic affairs and the procurement of provisions for the factory. The factories were all built in a compound in the southern suburb of Canton near the Pearl River. The foreigners were not allowed to remain in Canton after the trading season had ended. They had to go away or reside at Macao. The foreign traders had also to follow the Eight Regulations which stated: a. No foreign warship were
to enter the Bogue. Some basic conflicts--
It was a fact that increased contacts between the Chinese and the British
(apart from commercial transactions) would finally lead to some misunderstandings
and conflicts. This was due essentially to the divergent cultural values
of China and Britain. In the first place, in a Confucian society and
tradition, merchants were the lowest social class in terms of prestige
while the great mercantile families of Victorian Britain were the pillars
of the British Empire. The Chinese youth aimed himself promotion through
success in the civil service examinations. He focused his attention
on history and classical studies and had no special likings for things
foreign and mercantile. On the contrary, the English youths were eager
to make adventures overseas in the hope of making a fortune themselves. The problem of tribute--
China before the Opium War would not recognise any other state as equal
to herself. Foreign relations (trade or otherwise) were considered
as part of an hierarchical order consisting of the 'Middle Kingdom'
and the 'barbarians on the periphery'. Barbarian countries were all
regarded as tributary states only. The Canton System was in fact the
expression of this concept, a concept which denoted inequality in status
between China and the West. The EIC was more tolerant toward this scheme
because it did not want to jeopardise the existing trade privileges.
But when the EIC lost its monopoly, the British free traders were more
eager to obtain their diplomatic and commercial equality with China. Differences in legal concepts-- It was a major source of conflict between the Chinese and the foreigners at Canton. The Chinese legal spirit was to discourage law suits. In case of crime, the law considered the man involved guilty unless and until he proved himself innocent. Collective judicial responsibility was also important in Chinese law. All these were highly suspected by the British, especially after the Lady Hughes Case. The British sought most urgently some form of extraterritoriality. In fact, this jurisdiction problem involved sovereignty, the most important attribute of a state. The end of the EIC
monopoly-- Sino-British conflicts were aggravated by the
increase in contacts of the two nationals, especially alter the end
of the EIC monopoly in 1834. Indeed well before that year, the British
private trading firms known as the 'Agency Houses' were taking the
lead to expand Sino-British trade. Originally they got they licenses
from the EIC but eventually some of them took on some 'speculations'
in the handling of opium trade themselves. The most famous of these
agency houses was the Jardine, Matheson and Company. By 1834 these
agency houses handled more than 50% of Sino-British trade. They were
also the spearhead seeking for new markets for their surplus capital.
This expansion would certainly conflict with China's policy of self-containment.
Few of the new British traders were willing to endure the rules and
restrictions of the Canton System. Yet the Chinese remained adhorrent
to changes. The free traders were then determined to tear down the
undesirable Canton System and to strike away the outmoded tribute
diplomacy of China. |