As we have seen in previous sections, late Tokugawa Japan was being affected
by a number of internal changes. Generally speaking, the effects of these changes
were twofold: firstly, they undermined the Tokugawa rule of Japan; and secondly,
they prepared Japan for her modernization after the forced opening by the West
in the 1850s.
Economic changes - changes included the deterioration of
subsistence farming, the rise of commercial agriculture and rural industries,
as well
as the prosperity of urban commercial economy.
These changes in the first place undermined the Tokugawa rule of Japan. It
meant a decay of a gradually outdated feudal economy on which laid the basis
of the Tokugawa bakufu. For instance, wealth had been measured in terms of
rice yield, but wealth could by the early 19th century be derived from other
sources such as mining, trade and fishery. These new sources of wealth benefitted
mostly the tozama daimyo, traditional enemies of the shogunate, and the merchants.
In other words, the strength of Tokugawa rule was being weakened.
On the other hand, these changes prepared the groundwork for the modernization
of Japan. Japanese, especially the merchants and rural entrepreneurs, were
getting used to a cash economy, an early stage of industrialization and
a modest development of commerce. All these were indeed the seeds of capitalism.
Unwittingly,
Japan's feudal economy was giving way to an infant stage of capitalism.
When the Meiji modernization began, Japanese found themselves easier to
accept the more drastic economic changes.
Financial aspect - from the bakufu to the daimyo and their
samurai, all these ruling classes were confronted with financial difficulties.
The fundamental
cause was "a cash expenditure rising faster than a rice revenue."
Again, the effects were twofold. Firstly, it weakened the Tokugawa rule because
the relative strength between the shogunate and the tozama daimyo shifted
in the latter's favour. Reforms were much more successfully carried
out by Satsuma and Choshu than the bakufu and the fudai. As a result, in
the 1860s
the strength of the shogunate was barely stronger than a single tozama, as
we can see from the Choshu Expedition 1864. When Choshu and Satsuma allied
in 1866, it already spelt the death sentence of the shogunate. Furthermore,
the samurai class as a whole was in financial straits. Many of them agitated
for changes. Such a development, of course, weakened the main support of
the feudal structure in Japan.
Secondly, much groundwork for Japan's modernization was paved. In the
era of reforms in the early 19th century, it spelt the rise of reforming
daimyo who raised young men of modest samurai rank to form a new administrative
elite.
The debate over economic reforms, the rivalry between high-rank samurai and
"men of ability"-- all provided experience of politics and office
to a widening circle from which was to be drawn the future rulers of Japan.
Social changes - the chief sign of social changes was the
weakening of the social hierarchy which was meant to be rigid and immobile.
Yet economic
changes had social effects:
the rise of merchant class, the poverty of peasants, and the demoralization
of samurai.
Poverty of the peasants drove many to revolts in the early 19th century. These
revolts could not overthrow the bakufu, but they were indications of a failing
system. Meanwhile, the more prosperous merchants and rural entrepreneurs were
dissatisfied with their social status (lowest in the hierarchy) which by no
means reflected their economic power. Therefore they were dissatisfied with
the status quo. Small wonder, the Osaka merchants was one of the main forces
that joined in the anti-Tokugawa movement. Demoralization of many samurai was
reflected in their giving up of status and intermarried with the wealthy classes.
Others became ronins, agitating for changes and disturbing social order wherever
they went. In sum, the basis of Tokugawa rule was being weakened by these subversive
elements.
On the other hand, such social changes were beneficial to Japan's later
modernization. In general terms, Japanese were aware of the concept of social
mobility and of social status commensurate with economic power. These are
characteristics of a capitalist society, not of a feudal order. More specifically,
the merchant
classes had experience and wealth which proved helpful in the Meiji reforms.
In addition, hardship of the landless peasants drove many into towns and
cities to become labourers for industrialization.
Intellectual ferment - two changes were apparent by the early
19th century: the rising prestige and status of Japanese emperors, and
the growing influence
of Dutch scholars.
Both changes undermined the Tokugawa rule. The supreme position of the shogun
was being questioned. The more daring ones would view the shogun as an usurper
who showed no respect to the emperor. On the contrary, the "tenno" was
being regarded as the symbol of unity of the Japanese people at a time of
national crisis. This symbol was made use of by all groups in Japan in their
service.
The bakufu sought imperial sanction in the 1850s to those unequal treaties
with the West. The tozama daiinyo championed the "Sonno" movement
in an anti-bakufu struggle. At the same time, the Dutch scholars questioned
the seclusion policy and advocated the opening of Japan in an effort to carry
out "Eastern ethics, Western science." The ability of the Barbarian
Suppressing General (Shogun) to protect the country from aggression was directly
questioned.
These changes had positive effects as well. The unique position of the "tenno"
was exploited to nurse a sentiment of unity among all Japanese at a time
of national
crisis. The Meiji leaders very successfully made use of this sentiment to
carry out their reforms for all reforms were implemented in the name of the
emperor.
Opposition to reforms, therefore, meant a betrayal of the tenno. In the meantime,
the Meiji leaders were able to arouse Japanese patriotism and cultivate an
emperor-centred nationalism. This facilitated the transformation of Japan
from a feudal country to a modernized nation.
The influence of the Dutch scholars imparted a sense of realism in Japanese
minds. Seeing the impossibility of "joi", the more pragmatic leaders
accepted the opinion of opening Japan to the West and of learning from the
West. Thus, in an article of the Charter Oath 1868, the Meiji leaders advocated
that "Knowledge shall be sought all over the world and thus shall be
strengthened the foundation of the imperial polity."