The effects of the abolition of feudalism in Meiji Japan.
When we say that Tokugawa Japan was a feudal country, we refer to its two chief characteristics: political decentralization and social stratification. Politically, the Shogun reigned supreme in authority, but under the bakufu was a great number of daimyo who owned their fiefs in which they were petty despots. Decentralization is the key word.Socially, Japanese were divided into classes, ranging from samurai, peasants, artisans to merchants, in a descending order. Both vertical and horizontal mobility were difficult.
Abolition of feudalism -- with the beginning of Meiji Restoration, the ruling oligarchy intended an abolition of feudal heritages to achieve political centralization, social mobility, and economic transformation. Japan had to become a centralized nation to survive in the face of domestic and foreign threat.
Political centralization -- an administrative structure gradually
took shape between 1868 arid 1871 after the fall of the bakufu. This central
administration at Tokyo (formerly Edo) consisted of the Council of State (Dajokan)
which was divided into three chambers: a Left Chamber which in theory determined
on legislation; a Right Chamber which was to supervise the various ministries;
and a Central Chamber which retained all the actual authority both for legislation
and for supervision of the ministries. Key personnel in these bodies included
a few Court nobles (Iwakura Tomomi), two former daimyo, and a small group of
samurai from Satcho-Hito. (Saigo Takamori, Okubo Toshimichi, Matsukata Masayoshi
from Satsuma; Kido Koin, Ito Hirobumi, Yamagata Aritomo from Choshu; Okuma Shigenobu
from Hizen; Itagaki Taisuke from Tosa) This group was referred to as the Meiji
oligarchy.
A second step was to centralize the whole country under imperial authority at
the expense of feudal heritages. The Imperial Court first took over the former
domains of the Tokugawas. Next, daimyo of Satcho-Hito, under the persuasion
of their samurai retainers, voluntarily submit their fiefs of the Emperor in
March 1869. Finally, other daimyo were "advised" to follow the example
in the next few months. By 1871 the abolition of feudalism was completed when
Emperor Meiji announced that all land was to become imperial territory, and
domain armies were to be disbanded.
A compensation scheme followed for both the daimyo and samurai. As we shall
see later, each of these two classes suffered different fate. Following the
abolition of feudal domains, a system of local administration was structured.
In the early 1870s, 72 prefectures were set up, and the number was reduced to
45 by 1890. These were run by a system of local officialdom which rules were
codified. The whole system of local administration was subordinated to central
control through the Home Affairs Department at Tokyo. By and large, by mid-1870s,
the feudal structure of Tokugawa Japan was replaced by a centralized system
headed by the Meiji oligarchs.
Effects -- in abolishing the feudal domains, the Meiji leaders had gambled for high stakes and success brought them jurisdiction over the whole country's land, population, and revenue. Thus the central government had at least possessed the basic requirements for the creation of a modern state,h the central and local bureaucracies were refined in the following years. At Tokyo, successive political struggles eliminated dissatisfied elements from the ruling group. For example, Saigo Takamori and Itagaki Taisuke resigned in 1873 because of the Korean crisis. At a lower level, all appointments were determined by ability (selected through civil service examinations), experience and loyalty. All officials depended for their power on the central government at Tokyo. A set of civil service regulations put the entire bureaucracy in acceptable conditions. It was not until the preparation and proclamation of the Meiji Constitution that further institutional changes were made in the 1880s. Political changes of such a scale affected two vested interest groups of the past -- daimyo and samurai. Each had a different story to tell.
Social changes -- mobility -- feudalism implied
social stratification. The Meiji leaders changed the situation by first proclaiming
that all Japanese were the subjects of the Emperor, and all were equal before
law. Thus was ended social hierarchy with its class privileges for a few. For
the daimyo who had given up their domains, they were generously compensated.
These feudal lords were at first appointed governors (non-hereditary) to their
former fiefs, with an annual income equal to one-tenth of their former revenue.
Honorable titles were later granted to them and some were accepted in the House
of Peers with the proclamation of the Meiji Constitution.
The samurai were much less well treated. Socially, they were no longer a privileged
class since class distinctions were abolished in 1872. At the same time, the
creation of a new conscription army deprived them of their privilege of warriors
in Japan. In 1876, they were prohibited to wear swords, symbol of their dignity.
Economically, they were given half of the stipends that they formerly received
from their lords. They were given permission to enter farming, commerce, and
other occupations. In 1876, their stipends were commuted into interest-bearing
government bonds.
The peasants were granted liberty and equality before the law. They were allowed
to move into cities in search of new life. In return, all peasants paid taxes
to the government according to a new land tax system. In 1873, all land was
to be valued, and the owner of it was to pay an annual tax of 3 per cent of
its value in cash. Furthermore, they were liable to be conscripted in the army.
The merchant class reaped great benefits with the abolition of feudalism. Socially,
they were no longer inferior; indeed superior because status was now commensurate
with wealth. Economically, the patronage of commerce and industries by the Meiji
leaders gave them opportunities for investment. Many enriched themselves to
become entrepreneurs or members of zaibatsu.
Effects -- the abolition of feudalism affected each of the
main classes in Japan.
For the daimyo, it was a change for the better. In return for the loss of domains,
they were financially rewarded, politically honored and socially dignified.
Some joined the capitalist class; some were given titles of the new nobility;
some were given positions of advisory capacity; but only a few retained power
in the Meiji government.
The samurai were discontented. Their social and financial positions were worsened.
While a few took up careers in police, army, politics, business and the like,
the majority could not catch up with the rapidly changing reality. Most lived
in miserable conditions and grumbled all the day. The more daring ones finally
resorted to an uprising in 1877- the Satsuma Rebeffion under Saigo. Unsuccessful,
it proved to be the last feudal rising against the Meiji government and demonstrated
the success of the peasant conscription army.
The peasants fared little better. No longer paying feudal dues, they paid cash
to the government as land tax. The fixed percentage and cash payment caused
much hardship to the peasants because they were taken advantage of by the money
lenders and rice merchants. Rural unrest continued to be an element of instability
during the Meiji era.
Finally, the merchants rose to the top of the society. Many became capitalists
in a fast growing Japanese economy. The government patronage of industrialization
gave them chances for economic enrichment, social and political influence. They
were to become the backbone of the new society.